Skip to content

Weight Distribution Analysis

1. Purpose

This report provides a comprehensive weight analysis of TBS-001, covering:

  • Total weight of the container with all equipment installed (dry)
  • Total weight with all liquids added (camera ready)
  • Weight distribution (front-back, left-right) for three operational states
  • Center-of-gravity (CG) position and migration between states
  • ISO container gross weight compliance verification

The analysis is essential for transport planning, trailer axle placement, structural assessment, and understanding how the system's weight distribution changes during a photographic session.


2. Container Baseline

Parameter Value Source
Container type 20 ft standard ISO ISO 668
Tare weight (empty container) 2,200 kg (4,850 lbs) Hapag-Lloyd Container Spec
Max gross weight 24,000 kg (52,910 lbs) ISO 668
Max payload 21,800 kg (48,060 lbs) Gross − tare
Interior dimensions 5,893 × 2,362 × 2,388mm ISO 668

3. Component Weight Inventory

All weights are calculated from first principles (material density × volume) unless a specific report value is cited. Material densities used: mild steel 7,850 kg/m³, 304 SS 7,930 kg/m³, aluminum 2,700 kg/m³, marine plywood 600 kg/m³, HDPE (all light-lock plastic skin) 950 kg/m³, water 1,000 kg/m³.

3.1 Container

Component Weight (kg) Position Calculation Basis
Container shell (excl. doors) 1,920 Full footprint Hapag-Lloyd 20ft ISO tare (2,200 kg) minus doors (280 kg)
Cargo door — near leaf 140 Closed: X=−100 to −40 / Open: along near wall ISO door leaf, ~140 kg each
Cargo door — far leaf 140 Closed: X=−100 to −40 / Open: along far wall ISO door leaf, ~140 kg each

3.2 Structural Components

Component Weight (kg) X Range (mm) Yd Range (mm) Calculation Basis
Hinged panel (incl. Ø900 housing + punch-out bay) 161 0–80 (deployed); swung ~56° about the pivot (transport) 0–2,362 Framed panel: 1/8" HDPE plastic skins + 18mm-ply Fan-B mount band + 3mm-Al corner cores + 2×2×0.120in steel SHS center ≈ 119 kg + bolted 5mm-HDPE Ø900 housing ≈ 22 kg + 1/8"-HDPE punch-out bay ≈ 21 kg (first-principles). The Ø89 pivot post + bearings + cage are counted under "Swing pivot + cage hardware". See Hinged Panel Report §2.4–2.5 for the full movable-assembly breakdown
Light-trap drum (rotating) 69 0–40 (deployed); swung ~56° about the pivot (transport) 653–1,709 Ø864 C-shell, 1/8" HDPE plastic skin, no fins (suspended with panel) + 2× 8mm 6061-T6 Al end caps + rolled rim-angles + steel Ø75 stub shafts + 2× SKF 6215 bearings + the interior 40×40×5 SS pull-handle stile (bolts to the caps → rotates with the drum) + plugs + pull handle
Processing tray 114 280–4,629 80–2,280 304 SS 1.5mm, 2 panels × 57 kg (Water System Report §4)
Near walkway 37 470–4,629 0–300 10 brackets @ ~2.7 kg + 12.7 kg/m² GRP grating
Far walkway 37 470–4,629 2,062–2,362 Same as near walkway
Right walkway 44 4,329–4,629 0–2,362 Cantilever-rectangle: closed frame (2 long + 2 end beams) + 2 center cantilever arms off the IBC uprights (2×1×0.120in steel) + wall cleats + combined corner plates (shared with the BR film rail) + GRP grating
Left walkway 25 170–470 0–2,362 Removable lift-out: GRP grating + 5 floor-leg cantilever brackets (2×2 post + arm on bare floor outside the tray) + drum-exit punch-out (deeper grating)
Swing pivot + cage hardware 38 0–400 700–2,287 Rotation transport hardware: pivot bearings + collar + drum cage + wall stays + rail saddles, at the cargo-door end. Estimate — refine vs the rotation-hardware BOM
Container mods 65 Distributed Distributed Light seal foam + reinforcement plates (estimate)
Chem-prep shelf (fold-down, stowed) 7 1,180–1,780 0–22 Wall-hinged fold-down: 18mm phenolic ply + 2" Al angle frame + spill lip + continuous piano hinge + 2 stays ≈ 7 kg. Modeled stowed (folded up vs the pinhole wall) in all states; the ~25 kg deployed mixing load is a transient prep case (film plane parked) — see Chemistry Prep Shelves §3
Structure subtotal 600

3.3 Equipment

Component Weight (kg) X Range (mm) Yd Range (mm) Calculation Basis
Electrical panel 15 1,910–2,210 0–150 Wall-mount distribution panel
Battery bank 13 1,540–2,220 0–150 1× 100Ah LiFePO4 @ 13 kg (standard build; +13 kg for the optional 2nd pack)
Solar controller 2 1,700–1,800 0–100 MPPT charge controller
Plumbing — Corridor panel 5 4,760–4,874 1,046–1,160 4× Shurflo 2088 (P-01/P-03/P-04/P-05) + ACC-01
Plumbing — Pinhole Wall panel 8 3,300–4,016 12–196 P-02 + 3-stage Big Blue filter (dry); on the pinhole wall — est.
Film plane carriage 51 260–4,649 2,212–2,312 3mm Dibond ACM backing sheet ≈36 kg (3.80 kg/m² × the FP_W×FP_H face — moves with the plane) + plain 6061 Al angle frame (50.8×50.8×3.175mm; EXPENDABLE — kept aluminum for weight + cost, replace on pitting) + 58 nylon muslin clamps + 4 acetal skate carriages
Tilt-swing board 30 2,089–2,709 0–100 620×620×45mm Al plate + spherical pivot + screws
Fans (A+B) 4 End walls Near corners 2× 150mm axial panel fans
Baffle ducts 6 Distributed Distributed 2× galvanized steel baffle ducts
Blue IBC-1 (tote) 65 4,674–5,893 30–1,046 1,000L caged composite tare (top tier, near)
Blue IBC-2 (tote) 65 4,674–5,893 1,316–2,332 1,000L caged composite tare (top tier, far)
Brown IBC-3 (tote) 65 4,674–5,893 30–1,046 1,000L caged composite tare (bottom tier, near)
Waste IBC-4 (tote) 65 4,674–5,893 1,316–2,332 1,000L caged composite tare (bottom tier, far)
IBC restraint frame 123 4,654–5,104 1,046–1,316 2×2×0.120in steel restraint-only deep 4-leg box (totes direct-stack cage-on-cage): 4 full-height uprights (front pair X4654 + back pair X5104) + top/bottom rings + 4 floor flange feet + 8 front retaining bars (2/tote face — doubled for the loaded-transport case) + 8 identical 2-bolt wall joist hangers (through-bolted to 8 exterior backing plates, 16 penetrations) + rear-panel brackets + 4 anti-slip mats (Equipment Layout §5)
Equipment subtotal 515

3.4 Dry Weight Summary

Category Weight (kg) % of Dry Total
Container (shell + doors) 2,200 66.4%
Structure 600 18.1%
Equipment 515 15.5%
Total dry 3,315 100%

Grating weight assumption: 1" (25mm) molded GRP (fiberglass) grating, vinyl-ester resin with grit top, weighs ≈12.7 kg/m² (McNichols MS-S-100, 2.60 lb/sf) over the 4.14 m² of deck. GRP is specified for corrosion immunity in the wet photo-chemistry environment, at a cost premium of ~$720–$890 (see cost breakdown §6a). 1" is the thinnest molded FRP made (15mm molded GRP doesn't exist), so the deck sits at 140mm (115mm support arm + 25mm grate) — raised to keep the spray-bar carriage clearance under the left cantilever arms.


4. Liquid States

4.1 Camera Ready (Full Blue IBCs)

All wash water loaded in the two top-tier Blue IBCs. Bottom-tier Brown and Waste IBCs are empty. Processing tray is empty (water is pumped to the tray during processing, not pre-loaded).

Liquid Volume (L) Weight (kg) Position Tier
Blue IBC-1 water 900 900 X=4,674–5,893, Yd=30–1,046 Top (Z=1,336–2,236)
Blue IBC-2 water 900 900 X=4,674–5,893, Yd=1,316–2,332 Top (Z=1,336–2,236)
Total liquid 1,800 1,800

Total loaded weight: 5,115 kg (3,315 dry + 1,800 liquid)

4.2 Materials Exhausted (Ready for Resupply)

After a full session, wash water has been consumed and redistributed. Blue IBCs are empty; Brown (recycled) and Waste IBCs hold the ~1,245L recovered (~622L each). The processing tray has been drained; the other ~465L was lost to the open process (evaporation, wet-print carryout, unrecovered residual — see water-system report §4).

Liquid Volume (L) Weight (kg) Position Tier
Brown IBC-3 water 630 630 X=4,674–5,893, Yd=30–1,046 Bottom (Z=168–798)
Waste IBC-4 water 630 630 X=4,674–5,893, Yd=1,316–2,332 Bottom (Z=168–798)
Processing tray 0 Drained
Total liquid 1,260 1,260

Total exhausted weight: 4,575 kg (3,315 dry + 1,260 liquid)

4.3 State Comparison

State Total (kg) X_cg (mm) Yd_cg (mm) Z_cg (mm) Front/Rear Near/Far
Dry (Transport) 3,315 2,744 1,200 1,099 53.6/46.4% 48.0/52.0%
Loaded Transport (Blue full) 5,115 3,638 1,193 1,341 34.7/65.3% 48.7/51.3%
Camera Ready (Deployed) 5,115 3,635 1,178 1,340 34.7/65.3% 50.1/49.9%
Materials Exhausted (Transport) 4,575 3,444 1,195 929 38.8/61.2% 48.5/51.5%

Loaded Transport is the camera-ready water load (full top-tier Blue IBCs, 1,800 kg) carried in the transport configuration — panel swung in, cargo doors closed. The water sits in the top tier, so its vertical CG is **Z=1,341mm —

412mm higher than the exhausted state (929mm), making it the highest-CG transport case that governs road-transport stability (tie-down and cornering). The exhausted (return) state is both lighter — 4,575 kg, since ~465 kg of the processed water is lost to the open process rather than recovered — and lower-CG, so it is never the governing case. Even at the loaded worst case the static sideways tip threshold is ~41°** (½-width 1,181mm ÷ Z_cg 1,341mm), so the deliberate Blue-on-top layout stays comfortably stable.

4.4 Optional Max-Blue-Fill Transport Case

The standard load fills each Blue tote to 900L (1,800L). The totes are 1,000L vessels, so the equipment-layout report §8 notes they can be topped further — to ~1,900L (~950L per tote) — for one more print (~15). Re-running the weight model confirms even that heavier load stays well within transport limits:

Loaded Transport Gross mass Z_cg Static tip threshold
Standard Blue fill (1,800L) 5,086 kg 1,341mm 41.4°
Max Blue fill (1,900L) 5,186 kg 1,358mm 41.0°

The extra ~100 kg sits in the top tier, raising the worst-case vertical CG only 17mm and lowering the static sideways tip threshold ~0.4° (to 41.0° — still far above any rollover concern). Gross weight stays at ~22% of the ISO 668 24,000 kg limit. The optional max-Blue-fill top-up is therefore transport-validated.


5. Weight Distribution Diagrams

1 — Summary Comparison

Three-state side-by-side comparison with CG positions and summary table. The dry state is nearly balanced; the camera-ready/loaded states shift the CG rearward by ~890mm (the lighter exhausted return state by ~700mm).

TBS-001 — Weight Analysis: Summary Comparison

2 — Dry Weight (Configured for Transport)

All dry components shown at actual footprint positions, color-coded by category. The hinged panel is swung ~56° about the pivot (transport position), shifting its mass toward the far/pivot side. The right end zone (IBC stack area) is the densest zone.

TBS-001 — Weight Analysis: Dry — Transport

3 — Camera Ready (Panel Deployed)

Weight distribution with full Blue IBCs (top tier) and hinged panel deployed to its operational position at the cargo door end (X=0–80). CG marker shows the loaded center of gravity at X=3,635, Yd=1,178. Quadrant weights show the rear-heavy bias from the IBC stack.

TBS-001 — Weight Analysis: Camera Ready

4 — Materials Exhausted (Configured for Transport)

Water has migrated from top-tier Blue IBCs to bottom-tier Brown/Waste IBCs, and ~465 kg of it has been lost to the open process (evaporation, wet-print carryout, unrecovered residual — see water-system report §4), so only ~1,245 kg is recovered. The hinged panel is swung ~56° about the pivot to its transport position. Total mass therefore drops to 4,575 kg (~540 kg below the loaded state), and the vertical CG drops by 412mm (Z: 1,341929mm) as the remaining water settles in the bottom tier. This is the lightest, lowest-CG transport state — never the governing case.

TBS-001 — Weight Analysis: Materials Exhausted

5 — Loaded Transport (Full Blue IBCs)

The camera-ready water load (1,800 kg in the top-tier Blue IBCs) carried in transport configuration — panel swung in, cargo doors closed. The water is in the top tier, raising the vertical CG to Z=1,341mm (+412mm vs the lighter exhausted state at 929mm). This is the worst-case transport vertical CG.

TBS-001 — Weight Analysis: Loaded Transport


6. Analysis and Findings

6.1 ISO Gross Weight Compliance

All four states are well within the ISO 24,000 kg maximum gross weight:

State Total (kg) Margin (kg) Utilization
Dry 3,315 20,685 13.8%
Camera Ready 5,115 18,885 21.3%
Materials Exhausted 4,575 19,425 19.1%
Loaded Transport 5,115 18,885 21.3%

The container operates at about 19–21% of its rated capacity in all states. There is no structural concern from a gross weight perspective.

6.2 Left-Right Balance (Near/Far)

The near/far split stays close to balanced in all states (48.050.1% near). The transport states lean slightly far (up to ~52.0% far) because the swung panel + drum carry their mass toward the far/pivot side. This is by design: equipment on the pinhole wall (near side) is lightweight (electrical panel, battery, and solar controller totaling ~28 kg), the pump manifold is on the Corridor Plumbing Panel centered in the IBC corridor (Yd=1,046), and the IBC stack is centered across the container width. The film plane carriage contributes ~51 kg to the far side but is offset by the tilt-swing board on the near side.

6.3 Front-Rear Balance

The dry/transport state has a front-biased split (53.6/46.4%), with CG at X=2,744mm. This front bias comes from the cargo doors (280 kg total) being in their closed position at X≈−70mm, pulling the CG toward the cargo door end. The hinged panel is also swung ~56° about the pivot, keeping its mass in the front (door-end) half.

When liquids are added and the panel and doors are deployed (camera ready), the CG shifts rearward to X=3,635mm (~890mm past the dry CG). The doors swing open flat against the side walls (X=0–1,221mm), redistributing

280 kg from X≈−70 to X≈610, while 1,800 kg of water loads in the IBC stack zone (X=4,674–5,893mm). This creates a 34.7/65.3% front/rear split — the heavy 1,000L totes sit at the sealed end.

Transport implication: When loaded for transport (materials exhausted, doors closed), the container's CG is at 58.4% of the length from the cargo door end. For trailer placement, the container should be positioned so the rear (sealed) end sits over or near the trailer axle(s) to balance the load.

6.4 Vertical CG and Self-Stabilizing Design

The most significant finding is the vertical CG migration between states:

  • Loaded (top-tier water): Z_cg = 1,341mm (1,800 kg of water in top-tier IBCs)
  • Materials Exhausted: Z_cg = 929mm (1,245 kg of recovered water in bottom-tier IBCs)
  • ΔZ = −412mm (CG drops ~412mm during a session)

This is an inherent self-stabilizing feature of the 2×2 IBC stack design. 1,800 kg of clean water is loaded into the top-tier Blue IBCs and processed during a session; ~1,245 kg is recovered into the bottom-tier Brown/Waste IBCs and ~465 kg is lost to the open process, so total mass drops from 5,115 to 4,575 kg. The water that remains migrates from the top tier to the bottom tier, dropping the center of gravity by

412mm and improving stability through the session.

6.5 Walkway Weight Sensitivity

The walkway system contributes 149 kg (4.5% of dry weight), making it the second-largest structural subsystem after the hinged panel. The deck grating — 1" (25mm) molded GRP (fiberglass) at ≈12.7 kg/m² — is the largest single line in the walkway; GRP is specified for corrosion immunity in the wet photo-chemistry environment. The GRP is vinyl-ester resin with a grit top for slip resistance; the 25mm (1") grate sets the 140mm deck height (the spray-bar carriage clearance beneath it is set by the Ø32-wheel / 40×25-SS-beam shrink — see the Processing Tray & Spray Bar report).


7. Source References

  1. ISO 668:2020 — Series 1 freight containers: Classification, dimensions and ratings
  2. Hapag-Lloyd Container Specification — 20ft Standard Dry Container
  3. McNICHOLS — Fiberglass Grating / Grating Pacific — Molded FRP — Molded GRP (fiberglass) grating, vinyl-ester, weight tables
  4. Schütz Ecobulk MX 1000L — 1,000L caged composite IBC tote specifications (~65 kg tare; all four positions standardize on this size — a 600L caged tote does not exist)
  5. Water System Report — Processing tray weight (§4), IBC layout (§5)
  6. Light Trap Selection — Panel + drum weight (§7)